Skip to content

本番検証結果をQA記録へ反映 - #8

Merged
skjshr merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/qa-production-record
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

本番検証結果をQA記録へ反映#8
skjshr merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/qa-production-record

Conversation

@skjshr

@skjshr skjshr commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Vercel本番とSites version 5の実確認結果、Sites白画面の原因と修正、GitHub Actionsが課金上限で実行前停止した境界、物理機試験が未実施であることを記録します。

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
examserver-lab-origin Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 28, 2026 5:11pm

@skjshr
skjshr merged commit 164d5ab into main Jul 28, 2026
2 of 4 checks passed
@skjshr
skjshr deleted the agent/qa-production-record branch July 28, 2026 17:11

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 908c4860bb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread design-qa.md
Comment on lines +158 to +159
final result: production pass; GitHub-hosted CI not executed; physical hardware
NOT RUN

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve the required final-result marker

The new ending no longer contains the exact final result: passed marker required by the Done criteria in TASK_CONTRACT.md:73, so this QA artifact does not satisfy the repository's documented acceptance contract even though it records the individual verification boundaries. Include the required marker in the final line, or update the contract in the same change if the accepted format has intentionally changed.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant